Hi milk! What is your choice of approach as a therapist?
My method is psychodrama and my approach is phenomenology.
Hi milk! What is your choice of approach as a therapist?
My method is psychodrama and my approach is phenomenology.
What kind of information do you mostly store in your memory palace? I have one very clear mental place that I want to use. But it is also very dear to me so I want to be mindful of how I use it. It feels like I have too much information that I want to remember and too little space. Do you just build more rooms/palace's. Do you have any tips?
I store…well, everything to be honest. From faces, to birthdays, to phobe numbers, to happy memories, I lock up traumatic memories and feelings, I have rooms for my child self with healing tools on the inside, I store academic knowledge, scripts of lectures I need to give, passwords, places/addresses.
And no, no building more rooms, that’s why I recommend using a place that you do not have personal experience with. And choose a vast place because creating rooms usually makes it harder cause it’s another thing you have to memorize and without having a physical visual of it, it’s harder for imagined rooms to stick properly. Go on youtube and search your favorite style of architecture + castle/mansion/hotel something that is structurally big.
As a psych major, how do you analyze the characters so well? I mean what is your process?
Thank you for saying I analyze them well :). My process is I look at their canon behavior and then I try to understand how they became that way, using an exclusion method. For example: Will has a very vivid imagination. What makes someone develop that? Children who have loving parents, who encourage imagination and creativity is one option. Lonely children with no siblings who need to constantly escape their reality is another. Which one is the most plausible for Will, considering he doesn’t display any other traits of a person who grew up with loving parents? Yeah lol. That’s essentially how I do it in order to analyze them, specifically when I back track and theorize.
What's your take on Will's "empathy disorder" as a psychologist?
Coming back to answer this because it bothers me a little. I think the misunderstanding of this is what makes people see Will as a poor little meow meow.
Hannibal was either lying or the script lacked a good sense of psychology, when he says Will has an empathy disorder that he can’t “help but merge” with anyone.
The show presents Will’s “empathy disorder” as if it were a preternatural permeability, a sort of psychic transference, but it’s more of a refined skill honed by pattern recognition and the capacity for immersive role-play. He doesn’t indiscriminately merge with everyone, he selectively enters the minds of those he deems as kindred, specifically those whose violence and deviance resonate with the parts of him. it’s more of an imagination-driven capacity. Will’s process is less about feeling what others feel and more about constructing what they might have felt, based on the fragments of information he collects. It’s an act of imaginative synthesis, not passive absorption.
The ritualized trance he uses to reconstruct the scenes is a self-induced hypnotic state, suggesting it’s controlled and deliberate, not an unstoppable flood. The problem is that he can’t let go of the possibilities he entertains and he’s haunted by them because his mind loops around the horror of “what if I’m like them?” It’s less empathy in the traditional sense, and more about a deeply obsessive engagement with the idea of the killer’s mind.
Empathy is an idea we use to name something that’s really a more complex interplay of projection, pattern recognition, and your own sensitivity. In some people, these imaginative acts become so vivid that they feel like a direct experience of another’s pain. But there’s no external force, no real “absorption.” It’s the mind playing out possibilities with such intensity that the body responds as if those possibilities are real. Empathy isn’t a freestanding thing, it’s an emergent property of how you imagine and interpret others’ lives.
And it’s definitely not some random psychic power he was born with. This overwhelming “empathy” is a survival adaptation. If as a child you were forced to read others’ moods to stay safe, like anticipating a parent’s anger or a caretaker’s neglect, your mind might have grown accustomed to living in others’ emotional landscapes. It’s not empathy as a moral or spiritual quality, it’s vigilance, hyper-awareness, and an attempt to control unpredictable situations by knowing others completely. It’s a survival skill, not an altruistic feeling.
Trauma can prime someone to have this overwhelming, almost compulsive “empathy.” But it’s not empathy in the sense of clean, altruistic feeling…it’s trauma-driven self-absorption masquerading as connection. It’s a powerful, and often distressing, illusion the mind creates.