2024-08-06 15:58:14 ¶ ●

some less cohesive thoughts wrt something touched on in that last post.

i have assumed in some previous posts that by killing Calliope, Caliborn carves out some essential part of himself, and is thus cursed to an eternal Lack no matter the effort he might put into self-improvement. and while this is at least one interpretation proferred by the text, there is a fair argument i think to be made that it’s a cruel or even ableist one. the idea that Caliborn is “stunted” is ultimately a bit of poking fun (possibly even at the author’s own neuroses). while Caliborn makes it easy for us to come away with the impression that he’s stupid, he’s clearly not: his original plan to pass on the assassination of Calliope’s dream self to Jack Noir is, yes, an evil plan, but it’s a clever one! Calliope’s underestimation of Caliborn’s twisted genius is clearly a part of what allows the plan to work in the first place, and in retrospect this subterfuge clearly prefigures the kind of underhanded dealings that allowed Caliborn to take such complete control of Alternia.

I think it’s very tempting to see Scratch’s knack for manipulation as something Caliborn “stole” wholesale from Dirk-as-AR: the “Land of Someone’s Handicrafts I Took” certainly comes across as a suggestion that Caliborn is incapable of truly creating anything for himself. but this too is just making fun of Homestuck’s long-standing love affair with the Google image result photobash, and in the end the copy+paste only serves as one small step in Caliborn’s creative journey. Lord English is a dark mirror of Hussie, after all, and to accuse Caliborn of being creatively bankrupt is to suggest Homestuck itself of lacking originality… but of course that’s all part of the point. we can’t necessarily assume Homestuck’s default position is one of self-confidence; while it’s never been particularly shy about the bits and pieces it aped from the works of fiction that came before it,* the comic crucially does set out to question the ethics of reusing ideas, or even of telling a story in the first place. that Hussie didn’t even “create” his own characters - that they originate as some kind of timeless Platonic ideas that one merely plucks from the void when they’re needed to tell a story - is essential to the comic’s mythology; hell, how much of Homestuck even is there that isn’t just a remix of Hussie’s own previous work?

I asserted a couple years ago now that Homestuck is “only superficially” about creation and reproduction… but one particular rebuttal, that Homestuck actually very much is about reproduction in the sense that it is about the reproduction of images and ideas, has stuck with me since i first heard it. and though conversations about the difference between stealing / copying / learning / coming up with an original thought are obviously a LOT older than modern machine learning, given that Caliborn very literally goes on to become a Terminator-esque AI singularity (in a setting where all AI is just direct copies of living people’s essences, no less!) and even played with early examples of tech bro grift a couple years before the debate really took off, I find it a fun thought exercise to ponder the ways in which Caliborn’s contribution to Homestuck preempted the current discourse on algorithmically-generated art… which I suppose grows not just out of the more pedigreed argument about digital art as a medium, but probably stems all the way back to the dawn of comics as a medium, in all their entanglement with the burgeoning pop art movement. but that’s about where my area of expertise ends.

*it’s probably meaningful that the name of the planet Lord English “stole” his ideas for Alternia from, “befor-us”, is so widely reinterpretable as referring to pretty much anything that came “before us”.