I was fiddling with that Calliope post for a few days in my drafts, but combined with what I’ve been repeating recently about “Caliborn’s paradigm” I wonder if the point of classpect is to be interpreted?

obviously the aspects are symbols for fundamental concepts, and the point of a fundamental concept is whittling it down into something more real via interpretation (which is something we see in the comic, with Vriska thinking of Light as luck versus Rose thinking of fortune more in terms of fate)…

I suppose it could be argued that classes are the interpretations of the aspects, i.e. a Seer of Light inherently interprets “Light” differently to how a Thief of Light interprets it, but I think there’s a level of fundamentality to a class as well. they represent fictional archetypes moreso than RPG classes (RPG classes themselves tend to represent archetypes of folkloric hero, but Sburb’s classes take that a step or two further and, as such, a step or two more abstract); it’s something I’ve only lightly touched upon before, but essentially, like the aspects, the classes are ideas that are open to interpretation by their very nature; while the platonically ideal concept of a “Prince” does exist out there, each individual Prince from each individual story is a totally different iteration, a different “interpretation” of the idea of a Prince.

I guess this is roundaboutly similar to the popular existing theory that each class is defined by a kind of keyword; the Prince and Bard are “destroyers”, but it’s up to interpretation what exactly that entails (as Calliope puts it, a destroyer of x is “one who destroys x, or caUses destrUction throUgh x”). in the same vein, Thieves and Rogues are “stealers”, and so on; one major discipline of classpecting seems to be the scholarship of figuring out what the “keyword” is for every class pair.

but even that I find to be a bit too specific. because while Calliope certainly might interpret a Prince as a destroyer based on her observations of various Princes, in Caliborn’s paradigm Prince is likely to mean something completely different. to Caliborn, there are “LOWLY PAGE[S]” and Lords whose “NOBILITY IS MANIFEST”. he interprets classes as their literal meanings, the way Dirk thinks of a Prince as someone who “rule[s] over [their aspect] in a pompous, regal manner”; a way of thinking made manifest in the position of Princes in relation to Maids and Pages in Alternian society. because of course the opposite side of the “Homestuck characters are the audience” coin is that “Homestuck characters are the author”. in the same way Calliope’s interpretations of the classes are “true” because they line up with observable fact, Caliborn’s interpretation of the classes is made true when he gains control over the narrative and is able to skew the reader’s very ability to observe the facts. in Caliborn’s own words, “IF I BELIEVE HARD ENOUGH […] THEN THAT FACT BECOMES ABSOLUTELY INDISPUTABLE AS A PERMANENT MAN REALITY.”