December 2023

Dungeons and Daddies s2ep47 Spoilers.


I can’t draw, but the one scene in the latest episode that I can envision so clearly is at the end of the episode. Little baby Normal standing in front of a giant door,it’s ever so slightly cracked open, Normal”s half turned around, looking back towards the “camera”, a seaweed cone of hummus in his hands, he’s looking up at his dad and uncle (not shown) their shadows casting on him, he looks so scared, there’s the classic 🚨 red alarm lights 🚨, and at the top in scratchy horror font “Normal, what did you do!”

mbrainspaz:

remnantglow:

there’s only one thing worse than an awful book, and that is an awful book with ONE tantalisingly compelling element

an awful book is nothing. You can put it down and never think of it again. An awful book with ONE idea that perfectly captures your imagination can chip your soul out through your eyes with every sloppy syntax error and gaping plot hole while you scream, unable to look away

Which teen do you think is the oldest and youngest?

Linc’s oldest / Scary’s youngest

Linc’s oldest / Taylor’s youngest

Linc’s oldest / Normal youngest

Taylor’s oldest / Linc’s youngest

Taylor’s oldest / Scary’s youngest

Taylor’s oldest / Normal’s youngest

Scary’s oldest / Linc’s youngest

Scary’s oldest / Taylor’s youngest

Scary’s oldest / Normal’s youngest

Normal’s oldest / Linc’s youngest

Normal’s oldest / Scary’s youngest

Normal’s oldest / Taylor’s youngest

See Results

When Willy said “one of these days your families will stop falling for this trick.” I felt that personally.

I was thinking Willy would show up this episode and I was still taken by surprise, I’m so mad I fell for it, and then Willy shoved it in my face.

What's the bone you have to pick please tell?

babacontainsmultitudes:

Anon you gotta let a girl have her vague little vents in the final tags of a meme post lol. Answering that question properly would be a long-ass ramble, and not one I’m really ready to go off over while I’m still in the post-episode rush. There’s also just certain forms of negativity that I usually prefer to avoid bringing to the table?

…But since you asked, I suppose you could say that the gist is I often find myself feeling a bit weary of Will’s handling of Sparrow as an NPC, or more accurately his general lack of concern for the twins’ arcs in the greater narrative context. I think it’s great that Normal is a very emotionally stubborn character, but sometimes it’s a little *too much* for my personal tastes. Which is to say, I often get the impression that he is very preoccupied with optimizing Normal’s angst factor (often at the expense of nuance- particularly with respect to Sparrow’s characterization), and much less interested in giving Norm a relationship with his dad that actually develops or goes anywhere new or interesting. Mostly it just leaves me worried about whether or not things will end on a narratively satisfying beat or not by the end of the season (which, to be clear, does not mean I expect or want everything to be rainbows and butterflies, either).

Which isn’t to bring down Will too much as a player either- there’s obviously very many things that he does extremely well but. I mean all the players have their strengths and weaknesses, and when it comes to Will I guess one of my major critiques lies there! Hopefully that answers your question at least somewhat, anon. Not asking you to agree with these feelings, obviously. But hey, you’re the one who asked lol.

Willy should have had to roll a wisdom saving throw to not drop the act when the teens made fun of him.

Like, he hates being made fun of, and as he’s walking over, thinking “ha, these kids are so dumb, they’ll never suspect I’m that goody-goody Sparrow.” Only to be met with “Why are you walking like that?” “Just walk normally.” “You’re just clopping around over there.”

I like to imagine he’s just like, “keep it together, you’re about to get what you want, come on Willy, you can do this. Ok, get Normal and the doodler alone.” Then Scary flips him off and Taylor makes jerking off motions at him, he has got to be seconds away from power word killing one of them.

Here’s a Scary headcanon.

Scary’s a natural blonde, she dyed it black to be more goth, so at the beginning she had it dyed, but as the adventures kept lasting longer and longer, she hasn’t had time to dye it.

All this to say, in the latest episodes, where she’s been more open and supportive, her hair is almost back to her natural color, making her look more like when she went by Terri/Terry (however it’s spelled)

The Magnus Archives fandom confuses me so much.

I don’t go on discords or have chats with others in the fandom, I just look at post and occasionally post my own, so maybe I’m missing something.

But I’m so confused, I’ll see posts that are like “this fandom only cares about Jon and if you like any of the female characters you get hated on in every interaction, why do the girls get so much hate?” The I’ll turn around and see post that are just “the TMA girls did nothing wrong ever, Jon sucks, he’s a misogynist because he had an argument with a girl.”

Like, I keep seeing post mentioning TMA girl haters, but honestly, I tend to see more post being critical of Jon than the girls, and maybe that’s just because of who I follow (although Jon’s my favorite character in the show)

In my opinion, there’s more post being critical of Jon, because he’s the main character and therefor we see his journey a lot more, than the rest of the characters, so I think it’s easier to say “wow, this character, is so much better than Jon, because at least they didn’t [insert anything Jon did.]”

On the flip side, if another character did something wrong, we don’t always get to see what led them to that point, so we can say “Jon wouldn’t do something like this, this character sucks compared to Jon.”

And I think that’s the issue, comparing them. While comparing them may work if you’re talking about narrative foils or parallels, comparing them for moral discussions (as in, this character’s morally better then that one) doesn’t really work, because all the characters are well written characters that have motivations and morals that we can only speculate.

Sorry, I got distracted, what I’m trying to say is that I’ve seen post that hate on Jon, I’ve seen posts that hate on the girls, and both types of posts tend to turn one or all of the characters into boring one dimensional stereotypes instead of considering the nuances of all the characters.

You can’t say Jon’s never done anything wrong, he most certainly has, his actions hurt several people, but you can’t deny that he’s trying to be a good person.

You can’t say Melanie’s just mean and angry, that ignores everything that has happened and been done to her, but also her anger shouldn’t be excused, she’s hurt people, including herself.

Two things can exist at the same time; “Georgie has every right to distance herself from Jon” and “the lack of support Jon receives in season 4 from Georgie negatively impacted his health” can both be true, and it doesn’t put either of them in the wrong. Georgie isn’t obligated to stay when it would be detrimental to her, but that doesn’t mean that her choice doesn’t affect Jon.

The thing about TMA is that it’s very realistic, the characters don’t just make choices that have no later consequences, other characters aren’t just ok with everything Jon does because he’s the Main Character, and everything Jon does isn’t always right just because he’s the Main Character.

It’s like the real world in that everyone’s choices can positively or negatively affect others, and there’s not much “right” or “wrong” in those choices.