2025-11-10 0:06:28 ¶ ● ⬀ ⬈

rosalineandrosemary:

> feeling controversial so. daisy elias fandom misogyny parallels

> one is a queer woman masculinized because of the belief that violence and single-mindedness are masculine things (plus the idea that masculinity is “less work” and “less effort” and so she’d become more masculine as she becomes more dedicated to the hunt, despite that. not generally being true, Especially for people societally recognized as Men) while the other is a queer man repeatedly feminized due to his indirect control over varying aspects of the plot and treated as more incompetent because of it

> literally just begging yall to acknowledge the stereotypes you’re perpetuating while posting. please. someone being violent doesn’t mean they’re masc. someone being manipulative doesn’t mean they’re feminine

2025-11-11 22:44:47 ¶ ● ⬀ ⬈

magnuspanoptes:

> another thing is that jon is basically in captivity for the first four seasons. he can’t quit the head archivist position so that makes him. a captive. and the archivist job is intended to make him a victim of prolonged and repeated trauma. it’s not immediately apparent because he isn’t being kept in a literal attic but figuratively he was in the attic. the attic just happens to cover his whole life. and elias is responsible for every assault (by proxy), but since his alignment with the eye, i.e. role as the watcher naturally precludes him from getting personally involved in any of it (“My inclinations, predictably, were more toward watching than doing the deed myself.” - mary keay in MAG 62), their relationship is operating on this weird and ambiguous note where jon is aware that elias is responsible for his captivity but he’s never been subjected to the experience of elias personally hurting him. he’s very condescending and paternalistic with jon (father moment) but he just won’t. do that. in s3 jon knows there are monsters out there who want to hurt and kill him, but not elias! elias is the only one he can look to for any semblance of protection, elias is the only one he can ask, “am i still human?” because you see. he has absolutely nowhere else to go.

And I think that’s partially why Jon has never truly blamed Jonah. Like rationally he obviously knows Jonah is to blame, but emotionally he never seems to acknowledge the extent of Jonah’s abuse on him.

Isn’t it interesting that when Jon confronts him at the end he’s not taking revenge for himself, but only for other people? Especially considering that in the same season he repeatedly takes revenge on other people who hurt him?

And Jonah’s lack of direct action against him plays so well into Jon’s guilt complex! It makes it so much easier for him to believe that he’s responsible for everything, which obviously makes him miserable but also ‘helps’ him to deny the fact that Jonah has literally made an object out of him (an archive, not an archivist) in order to use it for his purpose. Until he has guilt he has agency.

So he never confronts Jonah, not really, even when he’s more powerful than him! And I’ll never get over it.

2025-11-12 11:57:43 ¶ ● ⬀ ⬈

edettethegreat:

> elias is such a hilarious character because his whole motive is so cartoonishly evil (world domination, immortality, the whole Bringing The Apocalypse thing), yet his whole demeanor is so serious and down to earth.

> elias “don’t be so dramatic” bouchard looks everyone dead in the eye and tells them that it’s very important to file their paperwork properly and if they waste company funds he’ll have to write them up and reprimand them on their next performance review.

> then everyone leaves the room and he continues orchestrating the end of the world, as if financial responsibility and Ending All Humanity are tasks of equal importance and significance.