2021-08-07 20:20:54 ¶ ● ⬀ ⬈

spooksier:

> spooksier:

> > spooksier:

> > > how mad do you think jonah magnus got when they made cocaine illegal

> > do you think he cried

> archival footage of jonah magnus in 1920 after they made cocaine illegal

2021-08-09 18:27:41 ¶ ●

##

Melanie king for H5?

[id: a partially coloured lineart headshot of melanie king, a woman with half-up half-down chin length hair, with teal streaks, wearing a jacket, choker and sunglasses. she has a blank, unimpressed look on her face. an emoji version of her expression is on the left. the background is scribbled red. end id]

top 10 melanie king epic moments

2021-08-09 18:59:02 ¶ ●

##

perhaps jon g10 sounds of crying?

[id: a partially coloured lineart headshot of jon sims, a man with curly hair pushed back, wearing a fleece jacket coloured in scribbly blue. he has a beard and various scars on his face and throat. he has a horrified expression, with bruising on his nose and temple, and blood splashed across his face. eyes float around him, staring at him. an emoji version of his expression is in the corner. end id]

can’t believe this is how im debuting my new(ish) jon design. hasn’t he been through enough

2021-08-10 13:42:31 ¶ ● ⬀ ⬈

feathered-serpents:

> Also now that I’ve had some time to sit on it. I think this is how I would’ve done the last three Magnus episodes

> (DISCLAIMER: I don’t hate the finale. I actually really like it, the best way I can describe is “I like it and wish there was MORE of it” this is 90% a thought experiment FOR FUN for myself NOT genuine criticism!!)

> So. Let’s do it.

> 198:

> - I’m going to take the existing 198 and just. Throw it into the wind. Much like Jon jumped off that ladder just. There it goes. Whoosh.

> - I know. That 198 is intended to be a respite from the craziness that was 191-197, thing is…199 is kinda that too. It’s regrouping and talking. I didn’t need both, I didn’t, while 198 is fun, I’m now making the entirety of 199 the bulk of 198. And it goes down roughly the same way with the major difference being that Jon becomes the pupil at the END of 198. It probably doesn’t go down exactly the same way just due to time but that is when it happens rather than the start of 200. We end RIGHT as Jon settles into being the Pupil and says something in that weird Pupil voice-warp he’s got going on (maybe dismissing Rosie?)

> 199:

> - Now 199 is basically JUST 200. Everything that happens in 200 happens HERE now and it’s mostly the same with a couple changes. First we get a little bit of Jon just BEING the Pupil, seeing that he was right, he is in control. He’s talking and acting like HIM before he starts the statement (and that statement stays, I like that statement) it’s just him equal parts relishing and hating being the Pupil.

> - After that, everything goes down the way it did in 200. Martin comes up, the tower blows up, Martin refuses to leave, Jon gives in. It all happens the same way, that scene is one of my favorites in the entire show it stays.

> - But it ends there, after the big sound of tapes winding and stopping THAT is where it stops. And that’s where we go into…

> 200:

> - So. Obviously. 200 is where things get really different.

> - This 200 is basically a callback to 100. It’s a bunch of tiny “statements” given to the surviving archival staff. The survivors of the apocalypse have come to THEM wanting… somewhere to document what happened to them. They aren’t great at it. They aren’t storytellers. There’s no- Archivist, here to make it easier. Some of them are very frank and stoic as they speak, some of them are overcome by emotion and can’t continue.

> - No matter what, it’s very calm, very quiet. Still. The silence after an explosion.

> - But Melanie, Georgie, and Basira take the “statements” many of which are DEFINITELY from people we’ve heard from before. Direct from subject statement givers. Cult members. People whose voices we remember, talking about their experience. The girls also talk back, and we get a little sliver into how they are coping with all of it.

> - And yes, we hear “Statement of ____” I am SO UPSET we didn’t get “Statement of ____” SAID IN 200. I’M SO MAD ABOUT THAT. anyway

> - The whole time we do hear mentions of the Archivist, and the “man who was with him.” People who saw them. People who hated them. People who felt a strange comfort by them. People who tried to worship them. Throughout all of this, the IRL listener slowly starts to realize that… they’re gone. They’re both gone. No one knows what happened to them. Maybe there’s even a dry joke from probably Melanie about the irony of that. Eventually, it probably is outright said that they’re gone, vanished, no bodies, no evidence, nothing.

> - And it ends the same way, I really like the last words being “Goodbye. I’m sorry and good luck” so we still hear that. It’s after they either decide they’re done taking “statements” like this. It was meant to help but seems to be doing more harm than good, or maybe they’ve run out of people who want to give their “statements” either way, it’s time to move on from this, from the tapes.

> - And I thought about there being some static or a rumble or an incomprehensible whisper before but I really think it’s much more powerful if the recorder just clicks off. There’s nothing spooky that happens, it just turns off.

2021-08-22 15:32:19 ¶ ● ⬀ ⬈

teachustheinsides:

> “Please state your name and the subject of your experience.”

> “Into that? You’re joking.”

> [ID/ digital colour drawing of Melanie King, portrayed as a young white woman with dark shoulder-length hair that is died blue at the bottom. She has a nose ring and gauge earrings and is wearing a white ‘Ghost Hunt UK’ tank top, of which the 'o’ in ghost is replaced by a simple drawing of a ghost. Her expression is hard and somewhat sceptical.]

2021-08-25 14:32:04 ¶ ● ⬀ ⬈

dudeiwannasleep:

> elias bouchard boss baby,,,boss bouchard,,, bouchard baby????

> [IMAGE ID: digital drawing of elias bouchard in the style of boss baby. he has gray hair, gray eyes, and a thin mustache. he is wearing black dress shoes, a brown suit with a button in the shape of a stylized eye, and an olive green tie. / END ID]

2021-08-29 15:54:09 ¶ ● ⬀ ⬈

yngwtasfour:

> bananonbinary:

> > bananonbinary:

> > > bananonbinary:

> > > > tma time travel au but instead of explaining anything jon and martin spend the entire time in a heated debate over whether it’s actually time travel or dimensional travel, and whether there’s a meaningful difference between the two.

> > > Jon: It’s dimensional travel; that’s even what Annabelle said it was, and Anya Villette proved that different universes can be moving faster or slower than each other. We’re clearly just in a universe that hasn’t yet caught up to ours.

> > > Martin: We haven’t seen any differences between where we are now and what we lived! if it’s another dimension, it’s indistinguishable from our past, so what’s the point in thinking of it differently?

> > > Jon: The point is that if it’s not time travel, then we left behind another world rather than overwriting it, and furthermore-

> > > Tim, who just asked if they wanted anything from the bakery:

> > Sasha: wait did you mention something about the apocalypse? can we go back to that?

> > Jon, standing and pacing: -and if it were time travel then we’d be in constant danger of paradoxes, something that clearly-

> > Martin, also standing and red in the face: Paradoxes?! You said yourself that the entities work on dream logic, not physics! If we time traveled, which we did, we could simply assume that-

> Jon, gesturing wildly to past Jon and Martin, who have not spoken a single word through all of this: Then how do you explain them?! It has to be dimensional travel because we’re doubled up! If this was time travel we’d have simply assumed their places!

> Martin: No, because in Back To The Future-

> Jon: Did you just cite Back To The fucking Future at me-

2021-08-30 4:28:02 ¶ ● ⬀ ⬈

faerie–kei:

> home - a tma pmv