June 2024

xiaodanart:

jonathan sims, everyone.

phantomrose96:

phantomrose96:

I know Jon acknowledges this but it’s funny to me that A Guest for Mr. Spider is just genuinely the LEAST credible statement out of all 81 we’ve heard so far.

Like okay, Mr. Statement Giver, you were a very young child, and you just read a spooky children’s book, and your childhood bully stole it from you. And you’re oh-so convinced that the way your bully walked off was because the book’s monster was calling him and the house he went into belonged to the book’s monster and the monster got him the end.

No one else who can corroborate any events. No evidence whatsoever. A hearsay statement from childhood that sounds like a normal interaction played-up by the imagination of a scared kid frightened by his scary book.

The only evidence in Jon’s favor is the fact that the book was a Leitner. But that’s basically tautological. The only reason Jon was lending extra credibility to Leitner-book statements is BECAUSE of his encounter with A Guest for Mr. Spider.

The absolutel audacity of Mr. Jonathan Archivist Sims to show up with not just AN unverifiable statement, but the MOST unverifiable statement to date. Statement ends.

Jon Archivist voice, mockingly: “Statement ends… Well, while I do not doubt that Mr. Sims was sharing this story in earnest, it is nothing more than a childhood flight of fantasy.

"There are no verifiably supernatural details in this case. All Mr. Sims recounts of scary spider limbs opening the door are far more likely explained by the over-active imagination of a child who has just read a scary, scary book. And a scary book is, itself, not a supernatural matter.

"Mr. Sims cannot recall the name of the childhood bully who, supposedly, vanished in this encounter. And with no name, there is hardly a lead to follow up on. Mr. Sims’ grandmother is dead and cannot be questioned. There were no eye-witnesses to the event, nor does Mr. Sims recall the street where the vanishing supposedly happened. The book cannot be recovered, nor even verified.

To waste archival resources on this would be beneath even Martin, I’ve decided. There is nothing to follow up on here. End recording.“

phantomrose96:

The Magnus Archives is a show because if someone says “the episode with the guy who was having bug sex” you need to say “which one?”

multiversal-andra:

ghosthouseart:

total solar eclipse

[image description: a watercolor painting of a solar eclipse shaped like a giant glowing eye in the sky. its eyelashes are formed by rays of light spearing out into the clouds. it sits in a dark purple sky, surrounded by thick purple clouds dotted with outlines of smaller eyes, over a yellow glow on the horizon, like a sunset. the lower edge of the painting is framed by silhouetted trees. /end i.d.]

@vague-magnus-archives

wolfythewitch:

Hello archivist